12 Angery Men :: essays research papers

The movie Twelve Angry Men bring forths with an 18 year old son from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his inglorious father. A jury of twelve custody are locked in the mental retardation fashion to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the voltaic chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the judiciary would non entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. even so before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. However, when the initial poll is taken juror 8 (Henry Fonda) registers a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. After questioning his saneness they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 (Henry Fonda) by agreeing to demonstrate the trial for one hour. Eventu entirelyy, as the talks proceed jur or 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is astray available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his broncobuster jurors hesitantly agrees with him. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at a unanimous not guilty verdict does not keep an eye on easily. The jury clangorings many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with for each one other. What protrudems to be a decisive guilty verdict as deliberations begin slowly becomes a questionable not sure. Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of good communication this paper pull up stakes focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them. First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation. Then, we will see how each individuals frame of reference and prejudices effect their perceptio n which bear difficulties in the communication process. If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. Take into consideration, referred to by juror numbers only they do not even have the benefit of knowing their names. These men have neer talked before. Each of them come from different situations with