Applying the Utilitarianism Theory: Case Study

Upon applying utilitarianism theory to turkey cocks current situation, tom would maximise the greatest good and increase the happiness of more people and parties by exaggerating his work populate. The first party that would benefit from this is his parents. As was said In the case study (2014), tom turkeys mother had lost her chore a fewer years ago and has remained unemployed since. tomcats father has also not been doing nearly financially, as his business has not been doing well as of lately, which would lead to slight income for the family.Toms parents would be better off financially, as they spastic no womb-to-tomb need to support Tom if he were to be hired by the invoice firm. 0 Another party that would achieve happiness from Toms put throughs would be a child of a developing nation that Tom has committed to keep going when he earns full time wage. Because Tom has not even been able to earn full time wage, he cannot afford to sponsor a child. The third party that would benefit is Tom himself. As was declared in the case study (2014), many firms have reduced or halted their graduate intake as of 2014.It is apparent that Tom is struggling to give away work, and Is currently unemployed and not earning a Income. It also known that Tom would be supervised for his first year of work (case study, 2014), which would benefit Tom himself as he lacks interpret within explanation firms, and this would provide him with unseas aced skills. Parties that would not benefit however are the more honest air applicants and current employees of the firm. Toms action would cause an unhappiness to these stakeholders because if Tom were to be employed, his actions would be unfair.Tom would be employed for false and exaggerated Information, where as the other military control applicants would have provided truthful Information and the other employees would eve had to earn their experience and skills minored to be employed by the accounting firm. One last stake holder that Toms actions would come to is the accounting firm itself and the clients. The accounting firm Is seeking for a problem applicant with proper skills and work experience for applicant to apply to the workplace, If Tom were to be hired however, he may not be to process the requirements the firm had needed.Clients of the firm may also receive poor or lower than expected of service quality from Tom due to the incident that Tom lacks experience within accounting firm work. Kantian ill be found upon applying two different formulations of Kantian to Toms situation. Formulation one will be ecumenic acceptability, and formulation two will be respect. Upon applying formulation one to Toms situation, the obtain would be To become a prospering Job applicant, you will need to exaggerate and give false culture on your curriculum vitae. If this rule was made to be made a universal rule the workforce would consist of more unskilled and to a lower place experienced workers. This would lead to a larger output of mischievous function and bad products due to the lack of skills from the workforce. Many employees would be earning wages that they dont be as their skill level doesnt match their high pay. Therefore the rule is not universally acceptable as when made a universal rule, there would be a larger output of bad services, bad products, and unfair wages. The second formulation is respect.By exaggerating Toms curriculum vitae, he is not masking respect to other stakeholders such as the other Job seekers, the accounting firm itself, clients to the firm, and all the employees that had been hired by the firm. Toms action does not battle array respect to these stakeholders as Tom is providing false information about himself to the accounting firm. By providing false information, Tom is creation unfair to other Job applicants and employees who may have provided truthful information and earned their experience and skills themselves quite an than lying.The a ccounting firm and the clients would also expect proper service, experience and skills from Tom, which Tom has falsely claimed he has. Thus, by exaggerating his curriculum vitae, Tom is disrespecting the stakeholders of the firm. Virtue ethical motive As for applying justness ethics to Toms situation, the relevant virtue identified for the dilemma is truth. Tom believes that if he exaggerates his curriculum vitae his chances of being hired is higher. However this action would not be virtuous, and is the vice of excess to the chosen virtue, known as boastfulness.The remaining corresponding vice is self-deprecating, which is a vice of deficiency. By being self- deprecating, Tom would have to under-exaggerate himself on his curriculum vitae. The virtue truthfulness is chosen because truthfulness lies between boastfulness and self-deprecating, in which boastfulness is seen relevant to the dilemma. By applying the virtue truthfulness to the dilemma, Tom would have to be honest about i s work experience rather than exaggerate it thus making Tom more virtuous.