The French Revolution :: essays research papers

The French mutation was an unstable, blood-filled clock. With 20,000 sent to theguillotine and an equal trope to prison, it is not unverbalized to find importance notwithstanding rather tofind meaning. The most decisive thing to look for in the revolution is justification, evidencesthat excuse or stick significance to the deaths of humany. John Locke, a philosophe of thetime, may have argued that a attracter who does not provide his people with inalienablerights is grounds for dismissal in the form of regicide1. On the other hand ThomasHobbes, also a philosopher, may have taken a different argument. It was his belief thatman is a brute, therefore he enquires a potentate to keep the quietness. John Lockes idealisticview point if upright properly could have provided the lower class of France withequality, something the were desperately in need of. The Thomas Hobbes approachwhich advocates control, could not have provided the people with such liberation, but intheory shou ld be able to maintain the peace among the people, the peace that seemed solacking during the French gyration. The French Revolution was a cataclysm for thefollowing reasons it happened too fast, it went too far, and it achieved too little.Thomas Paine a motif thinker of the era once said Time makes more convertsthan reason. With this quote we can see why revolution was successful in England, butnot France. England slowly used the Magna Carta (1213), Petition of Rights (1628), andthe Habeas Corpus turning (1679) to limit its monarch. It was a long road that was by nomeans perfect. With monarchs who paid little attention to the act(s) in place during their reign and parliament, like James (1603-1625) and Charles I (1625-1649) it was hard tosee progress quickly. These acts vie a vital role in Britains journey to democracy, finished them came proper representation of the people, equality, and what is now knownas the Glorious Revolution. France seemed to be on its way to a similar fate. In 1789, the Estates-General2had now received a promise of a head look at from Louis XVI. Prior to this time the verylarge third estate3 (26 million) had the same number of representatives in theEstates-General as the first estate4 (100,000) and the second estate5 (400,000) combined. Once the Estates-General had been renamed the National lying by the third estate aconstitution was in the works. During this time the people of France became restless,food shortages plagued the country side. It also appeared that Louis XVI might disassemble