Analysis of the article ‘What makes a good teacher?”

It is all in all- of the essence(p)(prenominal) to project what students value most in instructors peculiar(prenominal)ly forthwith when the continuing employment of a t to all(prenominal) iodineer dep destinations on the performance of students. Studies of what exist an adept instructor be actuate by several factors. For instance, the field of psychoanalyse pull up stakes do in conducting initial precept to instructors, their appraisal and pause curriculum reforms. The companionship of a instructor should embarrass the baron to contextualize and personalize the core for the learners as soundly as create strategies and principles of class commission.In addition, the teacher should run through fellowship of the characteristics of the learners and be suit satisfactory to interact puff up with them. It is withal required to recognize the set and purpose of command. thither argon contrasting airs that ar procedured in the identification of cap ab le teachers. The most common criteria be by re delegateation and performance of students in standardized tests as healthy the acquaintance of the teacher. an a nonher(prenominal)(prenominal) counsel of identification is by asking primary and secondary students their most strong teachers and qualities that made them that safe(p).Expert teachers crap highly unionised friendship bases with complex interconnected schemas which ar easily accessed. Besides they withstand skills and r come inines that are executed smoothly and effortless(prenominal). Expert teachers swear out towards their pedagogicalal goals while evaluating and monitoring their actions. This is through with(predicate) surviveledge of the crush master area, the techniques of breeding it at different takes of learning and finally rough-and-ready schoolroom management. A study was through with(p) to investigate views of a skillful lyric teacher to complement the markings of the characteristics whic h emerge from familiar education literature.The surveys were students of applied linguistics and TESOL in post graduate as well as diploma levels. whatsoever had experience in learn while others had n peerless and they were from different cultural backgrounds. The methods used to pull together data were interviews and questionnaires. The findings of the qualities of a rock-steady teacher starting with the most frequently menti integrityd were a teacher who hears the motives, expectations, strengths and weaknesses of students. Secondly, the acquaintance of the subject subject plus an pinch of dogma techniques.Ways of belongings up to involvement with the quarrel and the breeding methods of a particular verbiage was the least mentioned. T here are different views between teachers and students concerning what constitutes a impregnable teacher. According to students, the deuce qualities of a advanced teacher that were repeatedly mentioned include the cleverness of a teacher to explain to students so that they rotter all the way control. A nonher quality show uped out was cosmos right-hand, understanding, empathizing and hunt downership as well as organization.On the other hand, the two qualities seen as crucial by teachers were organization of the classroom and secondly fostering participation of the students. Other characteristics of a dependable teacher include skillful foul skills which mean fellowship of the subject matter, pedagogical skills as well as kind skills and personal qualities. besides, the simplest answer to what constitutes a unattackable teacher is that good teachers care oft almost the learning of their students than their own command. Some flock distinguish two types of teachers as the honest teacher and the good teacher.The happy teacher teaches good learning strategies for passageway interrogatoryinations while the good teacher teaches proficient skills in force(p) now places less emphasis on pr essuring students to pass exams. Instead the teacher tries to understand them and establish good relations with them. Teachers eject either be pragmatic or emphatic. The former refers to those who get good exam results while the latter refers to those who meet wider interpersonal, social and affective needs of the learner. It can merely be argued that an expert teacher should have a combination of the two.Perceptions and qualities that rush a good teacher can accordingly be summarized as keeping up to date with companionship and skill, having personal qualities of macrocosm humorous and finally be patient and enthusiastic about the work. phrase answer Pedagogy is the technique, principles and methods of instruction that a teacher uses to teach learners. There are galore(postnominal) slipway of inform students and they vary from one teacher to another(prenominal) depending on the level of the learners as well as the content of the material that they are learning.Even tho ugh each teacher has a different way of teaching, the basic principles should be applied to reduce drifting away from the education perspective. What constitutes an expert teacher is an arguable thing that keeps ever-changing between different singles. This is because each individual is different and has his own way of understanding things. Therefore, the opinion of what makes an expert teacher whitethorn vary from one person to another. A good teacher should be able to relate well with students through cunning the learners characteristics well, cosmos courteous and respecting them.The teacher has to be more than understanding and establish good relations while at the corresponding time try to teach them about life (Mullock, 2003, pp. 17). In addition it is historic to learn the students strengths and weaknesses so that the teacher may have an idea about which teaching methods to use and then wise(p) where to put more effort. A good teacher must know the subject of st udy thoroughly and be able to change the contents for the learners.For this to happen, intimacy and understanding of the subject matter is required since it becomes the framework for constructing other forms of declarative and procedural knowledge that are alpha for teaching (Mullock, 2003, pp. 10). Moreover, the teacher should be capable of transforming content knowledge to make it more interesting and comprehensive for the learners. This can be done by victimisation fascinating issuings, activities and self-aggrandizing accurate and assistantful feedback. Another important factor that contributes to a good teacher is interesting personnal characteristics.This include things like a good aesthesis of humour, enthuthiasm during teaching, involving the students in heated debates as well as outdoor activities. Making a lesson interesting is a very good way of capturing the attention of students. Students will list to look forward to the next lesson since they are enjoying the learning activity. Futhermore, it will be a good deal easier for the students to remember the lesson and what they were taught if it was exciting rather than if it was boring. A teacher should develop strategies of teaching and planning their lessons in effective and creative ways.These skills serve well to execute basic skills smoothly and efficiently (Mullock, 2003, pp. 13). This is important in managing not scarce the lessons but also the students in a planned manner. In addition, the students will be organized in their work, hence existence neat just like the teacher. A teacher should be an opportunistic planner, that is, having the ability to think on their feet. This means the ability to develop contingency plans for situations that are possible to occur but were not expected. An expert teacher should never provide incrorrect randomness to the students.This mostly happens when a teacher is changeable of a certain fact and does not want to admit lack of knowledge to the students. Some teachers may argue here saying that to admit lack of knowledge means lack of credibility. only this is not the case since the teacher can unceasingly give the answer at a later date or time after doing a research. Giving out in square up information is misleading a student. A good teacher should know what to teach and keep students in the instructional process to ensure smooth learning. Article ComprehensionThe condition was easy to read since the equipment casualty used were comprehensive. The writer has explained anything in a simple manner and as much(prenominal) there was a smooth play of ideas. The study done to investigate what makes a good teacher was thorough and each aspect was taken into consideration. In addition, the findings were defecate discussed and presented (Mullock, 2003, pp. 7). The word begins by introducing what other concourse have said about the subject. The topic of the article was also discussed briefly giving the reviewer an idea about what is liberation to be talked about.This include defining a teachers knowledge and what exactly a teacher should know (Mullock, 2003, pp. 4) The article has used a lot of comparisons which make narration not only when interesting but also simple. This include comparing views of two categories of people and stating see the lightly the differences while giving pellucid examples. An instance is where the writer has evaluated the opinion of some(prenominal) teachers and students on what constitutes a good teacher (Mullock, 2003, pp. 5). The information is then presented in a table for easy comparison and interpretation.Another tie beam was between a pragmatic teacher and an emphatic teacher with the distinctions plainly existence presented in a table (Mullock, 2003, pp. 17). finally, there are slight contrasting points that were obtained from the study done and the article has tried to exonerate them. An example is when a respondent fantastic two types of teache rs, the expert teacher and the good teacher. The article explains benefitly the different ways in which respondents views may differ and in the end gives a clear mindset (Mullock, 2003, pp. 17). There are however a few(prenominal) parts of the article that were intricate.This was mostly because of use of difficult rowing. An example is the use of the dustup lexico-grammar, phonology and semantic in a certain paragraph while try to explain the knowledge of a style and how it works in making of a good teacher (Mullock, 2003, pp. 11). All the words have been used in one sentence without explaining what they mean. This article does not have an exponent to explain hard words. An index is important to a reader because whenever a complex term is encountered, it can constantly be checked out, assuming that the reader does not have a dictionary in hand at that particular moment.Some of the tables in the article which were used in data presentation were also not very clear especially in the numerical content. For example there is a table in the article that delineated the most frequently mentioned characteristics of a good TESOL teacher. The characteristics have been listed clearly and comprehensively but the frequencies have been presented in a confuse manner (Mullock, 2003, pp. 10). It takes a reader a long time to be able to correctly interpret the data. This may lead to wrong translation or a misunderstanding of the facts.Important information obtained from the article onward I read the article, it was not clear to me what exactly a teachers knowledge should consist. about people have the assumption that a teacher should only have technical skills, content knowledge and curriculum knowledge. However this article has clearly specify what knowledge of a teacher should include and it is much more than the three just mentioned above. It has defined the knowledge of a teacher as content knowledge and also pedagogic content knowledge which is the ability to alter the contents for the learners.In addition a teacher should have general pedagogic knowledge, marrow to be familiar with the principles and strategies of classroom management and also have knowledge of characteristics of the learners. Finally the knowledge of education purpose and values has also been mentioned in the article (Mullock, 2003, pp. 4). This is important because having learnt what a teacher should know, it is up to the reader to ensure that they possess all these knowledge which will contribute to better teaching methods and practices.Furthermore, equal effort can be applied to each section when relating this knowledge so that a lot of constriction is not put on one side while ignoring the others. Having content knowledge means having the knowledge of the subject that you teach. This is important since a teacher should be familiar(predicate) with the topic of study so that whatsoever problem presented by student concerning the topic can be tackled correctly an d concernally. The article also mentions that a teacher should have knowledge of educational context.This means knowing the rings, the group, the classroom, the community and the district. Most teachers would ignore this and only concentrate on the students and the immediate surrounding which is the school. However light has been shed on the grandness of expanding the knowledge of the teacher in respect to the external environment which would help in addressing some external problems that students may occasionally have. The article has also mentioned that a teacher should know the values and purposes of education (Mullock, 2003, pp. 4).Most teachers assume that their only purpose is to teach. However this article has stated that a teacher should know the importance of education and the values, aims and objectives of education. This is important because whatever a teacher teaches the students or whichever method is used to teach, it will be of quality since the teacher understands that education is more than just teaching. Another important point learnt from the article is keeping up to date with teaching techniques (Mullock, 2003, pp. 15). Majority of teachers only go for training once.After that, they plunge themselves into the teaching profession and start teaching until they retire. However this should not be the case since changes will always take place. Something new may be introduced for example a new subject, materials of teaching or even new modes of teaching. It is consequently important for teachers to refresh their courses after all(prenominal) few years. This fact was not clear initially but after reading the article, its importance was clarified. Article Relevance The importance of this article is that it will help in understanding the different ways that a teacher should use to teach students.The article has compared different views of what really amounts to a good teacher and helps in learning the correct techniques that should be adopted. The study done could help in dealing with a dispute that most teachers face which is variance of learners. each learner has their own way of grasp things. The article has discussed what students think of how a teacher should teach. This can help through feature these factors and finding an appropriate way of teaching that will benefit all the students hence each one of them understanding the concepts being taught.This article has raised the issue of whether teachers should be taught how to teach. It does not matter if the teacher has had anterior training. There are new changes every day that come with invention and teachers must keep up to date with such changes. Therefore just like their students it is necessary to always be on the observation post while coming up with new, easier and better ways of teaching. The study of teaching methods helps in improving teaching techniques which in the end will make a teacher be good in what he or she does.The article points out the nee d for further studies to correlate perceptions of a good teacher with behavior of teachers in the classroom context and with larger number of subjects of different languages and educational backgrounds (Mullock, 2003, pp. 21). The article has focused in general on TESOL which is Teachers of English to Students of Other Languages. From the study, it is clear that for any teacher, knowledge of the subject matter is necessary. A language teacher should be fluent in the language being taught which includes in writing, reading, speaking and translation to the language the students are speaking.This means that the teacher should be fluent in both the language the students are speaking and the language the students are being taught. The article has pointed out that students nowadays are more critical and less accepting of teachers whose language skills are shortsighted (Mullock, 2003, pp. 20). Good TESOL teachers know the language and how it works. It thereof draws attention to the impo rtance of knowing thoroughly the field of study or the subject matter to avoid critism from students.Finally the article has highlighted all the qualities that make a good teacher from different perceptions. It is not possible for a teacher to have all the characteristics and just like a student, a teacher has both weak and strong points. It is therefore up to the teacher to look at these qualities and find out which ones suits his or her genius and then find a way to make good use of these traits and hold back them in teaching. From the article, it is also clear that teaching technique depends on the level of learners and the subject being taught to the learners.This helps a teacher to understand that a technique that may be successful to one group of learners may not be successful to another group. It can be concluded that the article has underscored important points of teaching techniques and qualities that make a good teacher hence respond a question that most teachers find c omplex about how to be a good teacher and what really constitutes to this. credit Mullock, B. (2003). WHAT MAKES A GOOD TEACHER? THE PERCEPTIONS OF graduate student TESOL STUDENTS. Prospect , 18 (3), 3-24.