Liberal Education as a Livingstone

During a epoch when unemployment is at its lowest since World War II, angiotensin converting enzyme would think that conclusion a wrinkle would be easy. However, at this point in time, appli bathts for furrows be much qualified than ever. The competition for well-paid production lines is stiff, and in order to get forth citizenry need non only skill in whizz certain ara, simply a commonplace intelligence of umteen subjects as well. A enceinte learning provides the general acquaintance that gives job applicants an sp are edge when applying for a job. With a base of companionship in the enceinte humanistic discipline and a specialization in a certain area, multitude prove to be beneficial to employers.Throughout this paper, I leave al star exercising the term bountiful cultivation non only in describing subjects analogous English, history, philosophy etc. , hardly as Livingst sensation describes a large-minded didactics an education which aims at produ cing as perfect and complete a gentleman be as may be. In using the term open-handed education I expect that all alumnuss of a liberal arts college draw an expertise in palaver, as the art of speaking and create verbally well is a key focus in the curriculum. I will also use the narrow down education in reference to Livingstones definition an education which aims at earning a living or reservation money.Undergraduates pursuing a liberal undergrad education have an advantage over people with a specialized undergraduate education because liberal education provides a outstandinger versatility in terms of a coarseer base of knowledge so that finding a job and excelling in distinct areas is easier. Training in art of rhetoric, which today is defined as the art of speaking and writing effectively, is a valuable asset for job hunters. Specialized undergraduate curriculums focus little on rhetoric than liberal arts curriculums.A person with training in rhetoric would be hire d over another applicant callable to their expertise in communicating ideas effectively through speech and writing. Companies aim to employ sharp people who can express themselves wisely and eloquently because in close e very(prenominal) profession, writing well and persuading others to ones opinion is innate scientists have to apply for grants in order to fund their research and experiments business community must present proposals and of course, columnists and authors who have not mastered the skill of rhetoric are less likely to find a job and be successful in terms of status and salary.Ability to express oneself all the way and effectively designates to what level one may raise in the merged ladder, for people with refined writing skills benefit companies to a large extent, small-arm people with less skill in writing have less influence, and thereof less power. People with a liberal education are skilled in multiple areas and therefore can be of more benefit to employe rs. Rather than a specialized learn in one area, a liberal education provides savants with a coarse range of knowledge that attracts employers. As Virtruvius says, liberal education teaches the student the connection between different disciplines.Kno come ong and realizing the relationship between subjects, an employee can perform a greater number of tasks and learn new ones more rapidly thus being more valuable to a company. Should a man lose his job due to it becoming extinct or other reasons, a liberal education would provide a better cushion to fall dorsum on because of the diversity of subjects studied. For example, if a court stenographer loses his job due to a new audio technology that records and word-processes court proceedings, he would not have to, in a sense, start over for lack of knowledge in other areas.Utilizing his knowledge in rhetoric, philosophy, history, and other humanities, he could find another job without going back to school. On the other hand, the unde rground would report that a liberal education would not benefit almost(prenominal) people because a curriculum based on the humanities repels many students. Rather than take courses that disinterest them, students should specialize in subjects they enjoy. One should not waste money on an education that does not focus on ones interests an education that does not stimulate the student is a failed education.In order to make the most out of undergraduate years, the students should study what interests them. In rebuttal, a liberal education does not suit every personality or preference. However, in the job market, having a liberal undergraduate education and a specialized graduate education gives people an advantage, for not only are they trained specially in their circumstantial area, but they also have a general knowledge of the liberal arts. Students interested in areas such as technology and sciences should take circlees that interest them.However, in addition to the sciences co urses, rhetoric classes would prove beneficial even in a scientific line of study. Every occupation entails writing in some way, and sharpening ones writing skills only reaps more benefits when searching for a job. Many people interested in the sciences and technologies specialize during their undergraduate years, and therefore miss out on training in rhetoric. Specialists who take classes to purify writing are better-prepared and more likely for find a job. other argument of the opposition people who start specializing during undergraduate years are better prepared for graduate school. They master and excel in one specific area of study. Whereas, it would take someone with a general undergraduate education a protracted time to master a specific area of study because of the attention spent on a broad education during undergraduate years. Instead of spending thousands of dollars on a general education, students could use the four years to specialize in the field that they enjoy.A l iberal education may prove beneficial for students who are unsealed about their major, but focused students should not waste their time on general education. Students who know what they want to focus on should specialize their education in order to expedite their college time and either start a masters degree or start their careers. It may take longer for a generally trained undergraduate to specialize in a certain area, but then again, if they are trained in sagaciousness the connection between different areas of study, they may be able to decompose up different subjects more quickly.There are really two issues here to refute. First, when studying, why is everything such a rush? People are in a hurry to enter the job force alternatively than to take their time during their schooling. I suppose the answer to the question is money. duration people are in school they pay thousands of dollars and receive very little back in comparison. Once they start working they can begin the p ayback period. Sadly, those who enter the workforce first do win in the sense that they can start paying back their debt, part the people still in school keep accumulating debt.Second, even if people with a liberal arts education enter the workforce at the same time, they are not at a disadvantage in terms of knowledge capability as the previous argument concludes. In fact, liberal arts undergraduates may be at a unconvincing advantage in terms of useful knowledge. For example, two applicants for a job have both had the same graduate education but one (person 1) had been trained in the liberal arts during undergraduate years, and the other (person 2) had specialized earlier.Assuming the two candidates preformed equally in gradate school, which may not be a fair assumption due to person 2s past knowledge and previous study, however, for arguments sake, drive both were successful in graduate school. An employer would choose person 1 because of the liberal arts background on top of the specialized graduate schooling. An employer would know that people with a liberal arts background are not only intelligent in their specific line of study, but also understand the connection between disciplines, and would choose the person with the broad base of education.In discussing liberal arts training, one assumes that every student who graduates has a well-developed knowledge of all the subjects a liberal education offers. However, it is not fair to assume that every student attending a liberal arts undergraduate school explores each subject extensively and excels in every class. Many students take advantage of the time they spend in undergraduate school by partying on weeknights and coming to class so tired that they cannot concentrate on the lesson, or even worse, they skip class all together.This careless behavior towards schooling hurts not only the students taste of the material, but their grades as well. It is time that all upperclassmen graduate with honors rather than right slide by. The effect on the community and valet de chambre would be astounding. Thousands of great minds graduate from college every year and become success stories like report Gates. Imagine every college student intellectually on par with the smartest graduate. Our world would be a different place. That is the place to which we should strive, and we have reached out last when everyone achieves individual excellence.