AMERICAN LITERATURE Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

AMERICAN LITERATURE - Essay ExampleFor this, he makes 2 rhetorical parallels one is betwixt some of his listeners and the wicked Israelites, and the other is between them and the narrator. The first one clarifies the Biblical metaphor of a sliding foot, that is, a state of being constantly exposed to perfections anger and protected only by His meer Pleasure (Edwards and Smolinski 5). The second one is a widely used public speaking proficiency the indirect speech from the part of those people whom a speaker wants to influence. Edwards describes the arguments of the unconverted people the following way Almost every natural Man that hears of Hell, flatters himself that he shall escape it he depends upon himself for his own Security every one lays reveal Matters in his own Mind how he shall avoid Damnation, and flatters himself that he contrives well for himself, and that his Schemes wint fail. (Edwards and Smolinski 9-10) This way, the speaker identifies with the unconverted listen ers or even with all of his listeners, even the converted ones, who be brook not piously enough. The identification is negative those who are out of Christ (Edwards and Smolinski 12) are the protagonist of this narrative, and their function as a protagonist is not to be a positive example but rather to study how awful are the consequences of the absence of certain positive actions. This type of texts is widely used in Biblical narratives (Bratcher). As for the antagonist in the plot, there is a controversy that does not permit to state plainly that this is theology. As Bratcher points out, God is always present in Biblical narratives as the central character. In this story, God is impersonated and shown in action infuriated, He is holding sinners over the pit of flames. Still, this does not mean that God is seen as an equal part on the literary vacation spot of Edwards text. He is an objective power beyond human rich, the power that has unquestioned influence on the world around and has a superior capability of self-control (as God in this sermon keeps from wreaking His wrath). This status of the figure of God is in line with Enlightenment deism for the thinkers like Samuel Clarke, John Toland, Anthony Collins, and even John Locke, Gods power and will is prior to ethic systems hence, this is Him who dictates the right behavior (Bristow). From this ethical perspective, the antagonist of unconverted human beings in Sinners in the Hands of an irascible God is their own liability to fall by themselves (Edwards and Smolinski 4), their Wickedness (Edwards and Smolinski 7). This situation is close to inescapable, as human beings are seen as naturally inclined to wickedness. They cede responsibilities, while God is not responsible for anything (Edwards and Smolinski 9). The only way to influence this terrible condition, that is, to become a part of agreement with God (thereby attaining at least(prenominal) some promises from Him) is to accept the existence of C hrist as an embodiment of the Promises of the Covenant of Grace (Edwards and Smolinski 11). Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is also a splendid argument alongside the powerful metaphoric pattern, it has a list of reasons that have to prove that non-Christians really have no alternative. Two Enlightenment trends of the sermon have already been mentioned. One is its deism for Edwards, conversion to Christianity is a natural act, the one that is justified by the world order. He frequently uses