Monday, February 25, 2019
Pursuit of Happyness and the Glass Castle Essay
twain discussing struggles in living, these ii memoirs, Pursuit of Happyness and the nut fastness causad the way to embrace life with rank(a)ly no fear. They both provided ideals and showed that nobody is impossible with the use of right and appropriate attitude towards the quest for success. Both be true stories based on life of successful individuals in America. The Pursuit of felicity tackles the life of Chris Gardner, a salesman of bone s exactlytner who rancid to be a stock broker. This written report can be considered as a modern sidereal day fairy tale set in a realistic world. This is no different comp argond to take a craper(a) success stories.The spot is basic everyy structured to show the trend of rugs to riches. But what fragmentised this floor from differents is the series of unfortunate circumstances and continuous lack of options. At the end, the alternative maladjustede has always been to proceed with the chosen subdue with courage. On the other hand, The Glass castle discussed the falsehood of horrendous minorhood of Jeanette Walls, who later became a journalist. The book shows two polarity of merciful experience along the trading floor of her family first, the given life which they do not control and second, the track of life they had chosen and fought for.The given life pertains to Jeanettes childhood where she experienced prominent flecks with her family while they keep on transferring to different locations. Frequently, these abstruse canonic novels argon bound with the stories with the relationships they had with the family. The struggles argon either quest to free them from poverty and then lift their enjoyd ones lives as well or the quest for dreams that they are rigoroust to achieve. The family as an element of the story volition provide the touch of personnel or inspiration for the master(prenominal) consultation to achieve.Taking a research at these two books, apparently, they both have this story element. The family of Chris Gardner is neither complex nor at ease. It is the typical husband- married woman- one child New York family. Economically wise, the family is financially challenged due to the instability with their income. The couple is both working at day making them decide to send their son to a day aid center. The problems they are encountering several(prenominal) cartridge clips leads to arguments between Chris and his wife. At one of the heated arguments, his wife decided to leave him.This departure is the touch of the story for either the biggest spill of the main character or the touch of breaking rank for his forthcoming success. The unless one left for Gardner is his son, and as mentioned above, the child served as the fillet of sole source of his inspiration. From that point, he experienced the worst parts of his life as told in the narration. He became homeless- he carries all his and his sons enclothe along way and facing the fact that they are alone and can only rely with each other. Their schedule and budget became so absurd that only a little mistake volition make their situation drastically worse.In one instance, when they missed a bus ride, they as well missed the stay in the place for homeless where they are regularly staying. While the Pursuit of Happyness has a little bracket of time scope used in its storytelling, the Glass fortification started from the childhood of the character. It showed the picture of the family, where Jeanette is involved, as not much functioning. Her beget is intoxicantic and her mother shows poor in handling the family and plays to be so childish. One thing cannot be denied though. These parents love their kids so much.Jeanette, as the narrator and the second oldest child in the family shows his hearty belief with her parents desires not to send them to any form of harm and secure them with all their require as long as they could. She believes that his father, Rex, is worthy of respect . She never lose the optimistic perception that if her father is not drunk, it will reveal his true side that he is caring for the children and just now turned to alcohol out of despair from embarrassment and disappointment. The kids had hard time when they are crossing the countries to find a new place to stay.They are like no upsets popping up in several different places and added to that are the behavior of their parents who are mildly psychologically ill. Their mother, Rose Mary is an artist at heart and was known to be childish at some point. there is a scene when she was caught hiding candies which make her gain weight. She went mad like a child when her kids learned about it. What made this mad is the fact that during those days, her children are in fact experiencing starvation and she still chose to get over food from them.Looking at these characters, it is obvious that the roles they have for the story as a whole are crucial in shaping the last mentioned status of the m ain character. The characters are element of the story that provides the touch of human experiences. It is important to notice that every character in a story doesnt just serve differently when it comes to their role but they as well vary with the way they are presented according to the power they are bestow with the plot and the storyline. Perhaps, this is measured with the way and with the degree of their impact on the story and other characters.Emphasis on the characters can be leading for on that point are characters that are much exposed passim the tale but have less significance with the essence of the story. Comparing these two memoirs, in that respect can be assumptions that the set of characters in the Glass Castle shows attitude more vivid than the set of characters in Pursuit of Happyness. The characters of Pursuit of happiness are dynamic humans but the picture of supporting characters of the Glass Castle shows a wider range of human tendencies. It doesnt necess arily mean though that the characters of the latter are worth being followed than the characters of the former.Analyzing the two main characters, Chris Gardner and Jeanette Walls, there is one common characteristic between them- optimism. They are equal to Helen Keller, who prefers to see good things but not necessarily veer those big things. What they are doing is to move straight towards the path they have chosen condescension those bad things. If we are to put that mindset into metaphor, it is about treating the obstacles and negativity as cheerleaders that are necessary to boost their hype of desire towards success. It is common that there are psychological pressures to ensure that the familys security is sustained and assured.And with these two main characters, in release had been the key. This serves the fact that whoever you were doesnt define who you are red ink to be instead whoever you were doesnt matter in the future (Murray & Fortinberry 14-17). Chris Gardner is a c omposed man who has subtle knowledge about boundaries boundaries that he has and boundaries that other people has. To prove this, along the argument he has with his wife, there was a neighbor who is trying to clean a rug and the dusts are all in the air. Being disturbed, Chris confront that guy and tell him to stop it for there are people trying to talk.This certain part of the story shows how Chris knows what he deserves in life although this given example is so subtle since it only talks about dusts and a rug. Later, his neighbor counter argues and continued cleaning. Chris was inhibit but what shows here is not defeat but the strength of the character as someone who has a solid knowledge about his demarcation as a neighbor, as an individual. Jeanette Walls, on the other hand, was remarkable because more than just her intelligence, she in like manner has guts to get out from poverty without blaming others much(prenominal) as her parents.Her family supplied the role of somehow similar to a typical obstructer in a novel. But this is not how it was perceived in this memoir. The parents, throughout the novel, showed the picture of being irresponsible. The family is in the poverty line. These are both legitimate reasons for a child to hate the situations where they are involved. Surprisingly, Jeanette is not that kind of child or to be exact, she is the complete opposite of that. Unconditional love has been a type for romantic fictions but seldom that it was used in the setting of a family. The way it was shown is remarkably skilled.Jeanette, indeed, grew up as a study machine that gains knowledge and used them to endure all the obstacles she is facing in her life. Like what was mentioned, the supporting character of the Glass Castle has added an unusual cereal on the story. This happened because the characters were introduced with diversified tendencies. Rose Mary was inclined to art and is a brilliant woman. Later, it was revealed that due to some g et bys with her husband, she started to act childish. This shift with the mother will only contribute to the failure of their family.One significant key point in both stories is the concept of fatherhood. Fatherhood is a common subject for art pieces not just for literature. Patriarchy is a social phenomenon that needs to be handled with enough care for this is more than just an issue of individualism or masculinity but more on its social context. There are two dimension of fatherhood First, the role as a father to children and second, the role as the husband. Contract theories had been applied in the sphere of influence of social sciences to analyze each role further. Moreover, it has its governmental and social considerations mostly.In relation to paternal governing, in reference to the works of Robert Goodin and Philipp Pettit, in the separate story of Gardner and Walls, the dimension that was mostly tackled is the paternal role of fatherhood. The main difference is the direc tion of the issue in relation to the social environment. There are no issues between Chris and his son. The issues in the story are just order on them from the outside social environment. Poverty is one situation which is characterized by being homeless, jobless and frequent starvation. This fatherhood example is a showcase of paternal situation that was determined by the outside factors.The direction of the issue is different in the case of Walls. Jeanette has issue with her father, whether she is indifferent of it or not. What remained consume is that the dynamics of the role of her father was finished by depressions. It thence ruined the social environment which is the family. This issue was even amplified when the father turned into alcohol as a defense mechanism for all their mishaps. This patriarchal politics had been one of the central ideas of both memoirs and is crucial in understanding the feeling of them.Chris Gardner is a hero for his son, Christopher. This is a str ong indicator of his paternal polarity. The track that Chris alikek is solely devoted for them. This shows that whatever is going to happen to anyone of them, the effect will be on both of them. This tie between the two is very well shown in the book without any usage of sentimentality and without using too much romanticism. In the case of Jeanette Walls, the idea of paternal hero is also significant. Her wish to have a hero father is not repressed. For her, it is the mankind that she is seeing.His father is more than just a drunkard but a loving individual to her and the rest of her family. In this perception, apparently, the idea of hero father is more realistic in the story of Pursuit of Happyness. There remained an elicit idea that what Walls is conceiving or perceiving is a better or even absolute symbol of a more perfect fatherhood. Both stories are cautiously written which secured the hook it can make to those who are after self-improvement. aft(prenominal) all, these ar e just memoirs which are supposed to provide the stories that are personally addressed.But in the history of this form of literature, we cant ignore the fact that people are meant to be inspired by them and consequently change their selves. Works Cited Gardner, Chris and Troupe Quincy. the Pursuit of Happyness. MI Amistad. (2006). Walls, Jeanette. The Glass Castle A Memoir. NY Scribner (2005) Murray, Bob and Fortinberry, Alicia . Creating optimism. USA Mc Graw Hill (2004) Goodin,Robert and Petit,Philip. Contemporary political philosophy. MA Wiley Blackwell (1997) University of Oklahoma. World Literature Today. OK University of Oklahoma Press. (1999)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment